Art Spiegelman's Maus |
Alternative Comics: A Brief History
The
roots of alternative comics can be traced to the underground comix movement of
the late 1960s and early 1970s. Underground comix came from several sources:
‘zines, college humor magazines, underground newspapers, and psychedelic rock
poster art (Hatfield 9, 28).An argument against the idea that comic books are
just for children, comix were geared toward adults and were different in tone;
they were personal, self-regarding, satirical, critical, and political (Hatfield 35).
Crucial to
this new movement were the rejection of mainstream formulas; the exploration of
(to comics) new genres, as well as the revival, at times ironic recasting, of
genres long neglected; a diversification of graphic style; a budding
internationalism, as cartoonists learned from other cultures and other
traditions; and, especially, the exploration of searchingly personal and at
times boldly political themes. What’s more, alternative comics invited a new
formalism, that is, an intensive reexamining of the formal tensions inherent in
comics…” (10).
Not too long
ago and before manga’s arrival in America, everything comics-like other than
superhero titles and genre fiction was lumped into the vague catchall of
“alternative” comics, especially those not produced by mainstream comics
publishers. Today, we find more specific descriptors—a good thing, because the
medium is far too rich and diverse for such ‘either/or’ analyses. Now the
Alternative label is used mainly to describe experimental or trendsetting
comics—those exploring unusual themes or employing notably different storytelling
devices or artistic styles (85).
The
well-known writers and artists of alternative comics include Harvey Pekar,
Gilbert and Jaime Hernandez, Lynda Barry, Chester Brown, Joe Sacco, Chris Ware,
Daniel Clowes, and Art Spiegelman, whose work I will discuss in more detail in
the next section (Hatfield 20).
Evolution: Dipping into the Mainstream
Alternative
comics flourished in the underground but, at some point, they began to catch
the attention of the mainstream—and even academia. Though there may have been
some earlier titles that filtered through, the biggest cross-over was Art
Spiegelman’s autobiographical Maus: A
Survivor’s Tale.
Literature Review
Following is a
small sampling of the vast amount of professional articles, from a wide array
of disciplines, which examine Maus.
These articles demonstrate the impact this graphic novel has had on academic
study. These articles focus on the thematic and illustrative aspects of Maus.
“Art Spiegelman’s Maus: A Survivor’s Tale: A Bibliographic Essay”
Hye Su Park
This
article provides a survey of existing Maus
criticism and focuses on the themes dealt with in the story: trauma,
postmemory, generational transmission, autobiography, history, posthistory,
ethics of representation, postmodernism, narratology, photography and art,
gender, Jewish identity, and use of English. Park provides suggestions for
future critiques of Maus in an
attempt to “broaden and enrich the field with an eye on expanding critical
discourse” (Park 146). The author notes that the same thematic ground continues
to be covered and rehashed in Maus
criticism and that there is a lack of criticism addressing issues such as
gender, religion, and critical pedagogy (Park 148).
“Art Spiegelman’s Maus: Graphic Art and the Holocaust”
Thomas Doherty
In this article, Doherty discusses
the inherent difficulty in classing autobiographical graphic novels as strictly
fiction or nonfiction, since there is a perceived overlapping of genres. In
addition to this confusion, is the confusion produced by a serious subject
being depicted with illustrations. Doherty says:
From a
traditionalist vantage point, the readily accessible, easy-on-the-eye
comic-book format of Maus would in itself disqualify and indict the work.
Spiegelman’s medium is associated with the madcap, the childish, the trivial.
By its very nature it seems ill-equipped for the moral seriousness and tonal
restraint that have been demanded of Holocaust art. But—also by its very
nature—the cartoon medium possesses a graphic quality well-suited to a
confrontation with Nazism and the Holocaust. (71)
According
to Doherty, the medium and the message are inextricably linked; the style and
purpose of the illustrations are inspired by cartoons and cinema, “the two
graphic media whose images make up the visual memory of the twelve-year Reich,”
(71-71).
Literature Analysis
As
we see in Hye Su Park’s bibliographic essay, there is a wealth of themes to
examine in Maus and, though these
themes have been discussed and deconstructed to a seemingly exhaustive extent,
there are still some themes that require deeper consideration. Park offers
advice for future critics because it is a given that this text’s themes will
continue to be examined.
The themes and illustrations in graphic novels
function as a unit, as Doherty points out in his article. Themes can be
enhanced and extrapolated through the illustrations and, in the case of Maus, the reader may perceive many
layers of meaning because of the interaction of the text with the graphics. The
graphics in Maus also provide the
reader another perspective by which to view the historical context of the
story. The illustrations are linked with the story, obviously, but also entwined
with the history of the Nazis, adding yet another layer of irony to
Spiegelman’s story.
This small sampling of the
professional literature written about Maus
is undeniable proof that the academic world has indeed accepted the graphic
novel as a true literary and artistic form. By approaching Maus with the same critical and theoretical tools used to dissect
traditional literature, some scholars are putting graphic novels on the same
level as literature.
Between the Punk and the Curator
Charles
Hatfield points out in Alternative
Comics: An Emerging Literature,
Alternative comics,
coming as they do out of a marginalized subculture, uneasily straddle two
different attitudes about comic art: one, that the form is at its best an
underground art, teasing and outraging bourgeois society from a gutter-level
position of economic hopelessness and (paradoxically) unchecked artistic
freedom; two, that the form needs and deserves cultural legitimatization as a
means of artistic expression. (That would include academic legitimization.)
Alternative comics waver between these two positions—between the punk and the
curator, so to speak.These contrasting values may not ever be reconciled but
both must be acknowledged (13-14).
Alternative
comics creators who feel the weight of these warring values keenly may feel
they are, analogously, in the same situation as bipolar artists who refuse to
take mood stabilizers because they are worried they will lose their edge—the
mental spark that fuels their creativity. These ideals—mental health vs.
creativity, underground anonymity/integrity vs. mainstream success—are
perceived to be mutually exclusive but they do not have to be. Mainstream
success does not lessen the impact of the work but it does give it greater
visibility. The DIY/independent/underground attitude of alternative comics does
not have to be compromised by legitimization through the mainstream or through
the academic world. Persepolis has
proven that alternative comics can be critical and mainstream successes,
without losing their subversive edge.
Conclusion
Literature
departments aren’t the only places graphic novels are being studied; other
fields, including art, communication, history, sociology, linguistics, and
sociology departments are also finding them useful tools for instruction. Significant
academic interest has been shown in alternative comics in particular in the
last few years (O’English 167-168). While some worry that study in the
seemingly stiff and serious milieu of academia or being consumed by the
mainstream masses will dull the edges of alternative comics, they will most
likely continue to retain the personal, brutally honest, and subversive style
of their ancestor comix. The professional literature demonstrates that graphic novels can be serious literature. The autobiographical alternative comic Maus signaled the change and continues to inspire today, several decades after it originally appeared. In the future, the graphic novel’s reputation as a true literary form will continue to grow as the format earns more respect, academically. These texts tell us things about our culture, society, and history and, as Maus demonstrates, can be valuable tools for teaching students, not just about the facts of history, but the implications of historical events and the people involved and impacted by them.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
OF SUGGESTED READING
B, David. Epileptic. New York: Pantheon Books,
2005. Print.
Bechdel, Alison. Dykes to Watch Out for. Ithaca,
N.Y: Firebrand Books, 1986. Print.
Bechdel, Alison. Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006. Print.
Brabner, Joyce, Harvey Pekar, and Frank Stack. Our
Cancer Year. New York: Four Walls
Eight Windows, 1994. Print.
Clell, Madison. Cuckoo. Portland, OR: Green Door
Studios, 2002. Print.
Clowes, Daniel. David Boring. New York: Pantheon
Books, 2000. Print.
Clowes, Daniel. Ghost World. Seattle, Wash:
Fantagraphics, 2001. Print.
Clowes, Daniel. Ice Haven. New York: Pantheon
Books, 2005. Print.
Clowes, Daniel. Wilson. Montréal: Drawn &
Quarterly, 2010. Print.
Green, Justin. Binky
Brown Meets the Holy Virgin Mary. San
Francisco : McSweeney's
Books,
2009. Print.
Pekar, Harvey, Kevin Brown, and Gregory Budgett. American
Splendor: The Life and
Times of Harvey Pekar : Stories. New
York: Ballantine Books, 2003. Print.
Pekar, Harvey, Dean Haspiel, Lee Loughridge, and Pat
Brosseau. The Quitter. New
York: DC Comics, 2005. Print.
Satrapi, Marjane. Persepolis. New York: Pantheon
Books, 2003. Print.
Satrapi, Marjane. Persepolis 2: The Story of a Return.
New York: Pantheon Books, 2004. Print.
Spiegelman, Art. In the Shadow of No Towers. New
York: Pantheon Books, 2004. Print.
Spiegelman, Art. Maus: A Survivor's Tale. New
York: Pantheon Books, 1997. Print.
Spiegelman, Art. Maus II: A Survivor's Tale : and Here
My Troubles Began. New York: Pantheon Books, 1991. Print.
WORKS CITED
Doherty, Thomas.
"Art Spiegelman's Maus: Graphic art and the Holocaust." American
Literature 68.1 (1996): 69. Academic
Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 27 July 2011.
Fazioli, Carol.
"Maus: A Survivor's Tale: My Father Bleeds History/Maus II: And Here
My Troubles Began (Book)."
School Library Journal 49.11 (2003): 84. Library, Information Science
& Technology Abstracts with Full Text. EBSCO. Web. 27 July 2011.
Hatfield,
Charles. Alternative Comics: An Emerging
Literature. Jackson, MS: The Univesity
Press
of Mississippi, 2005. Print.
Park, Hye Su.
"Art Spiegelman's Maus: A Survivor's Tale: A Bibliographic Essay."
Shofar: An Interdisciplinary
Journal of Jewish Studies
29.2 (2011): 146-164. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 27 July
2011.
Lavin, Michael R. “American Comics: Beyond the Superhero, Part Two,
General Fiction
and
Nonfiction.” Graphic Novels: Beyond the Basiccs: Insights and Issues for
Libraries. Ed. Martha Cornog and Timothy Perper. Santa Barbara, CA:
Libraries Unlimited, 2009. Print.
Lavin, Michael R.
"A Librarian's Guide to Independent Comics: Part One, Publisher
Profiles." Serials
Review 25.1 (1999): 29. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 27
July 2011.
O’English, Lorena. “Comics and Graphics Novels in the Academic Library
Collection.”
Graphic Novels: Beyond the
Basiccs: Insights and Issues for Libraries. Ed. Martha Cornog and
Timothy Perper. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, 2009. Print.
O'English, Lorena, J. Gregory Matthews, and Elizabeth Blakesley
Lindsay. "Graphic
Novels
in Academic Libraries: From Maus to Manga and Beyond." Journal of
Academic Librarianship 32.2 (2006): 173-182. Academic Search Complete.
EBSCO. Web. 27 July 2011.
Spiegelman, Art. Maus: A Survivor’s Tale II: And Here My
Troubles Began. New York:
Pantheon
Books, 1991. Print.